-
Thanks for the info. My contention was that Causes was not an effective fundraising tool. You seem to think it could be. Let's hope so. According to numbers i found on techcrunch - http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/28/causes-reports-on-its-first-year/ , roughly 20,000 orgs received $2.5 in donations as of last year. That sounds like alot but it
-
To what end, Tim? To promote social networking or their mission? What should the desired outcome be for the increased effort? If the desired outcome is increased revenue, then I suspect it's not going to work.
-
I guess it depends on one's perspective. I think it's a fine replacement for bulk mailing. I don't think it's that effective for fundraising. For example, the cause Autism speaks has 107, 979 members who have donated $5697. That's not so great. Another example, Think Autism has over a 1,000,000 members who have combined for whopping