Thanks for the info. My contention was that Causes was not an effective fundraising tool. You seem to think it could be. Let's hope so.
According to numbers i found on techcrunch - http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/28/causes-reports-on-its-first-year/, roughly 20,000 orgs received $2.5 in donations as of last year. That sounds like alot but it really isn't. Thats an average of $125 per org/cause.
You note that you've processed $10 MM to date. How many orgs is that for? I'm assuming that there are over 100,000 Causes by now. If so, that's still only about $100 per Cause.
Given those numbers, I think decision makers at NPO's need to think twice about using Causes as a fundraising tool. It hasn't proven to be that effective for that,
Thats not to say that it never could be or that Causes is not useful for awreness building. I also don't think its a matter of orgs not figuring it out yet. It could just be that the forum itself (Facebook) is not conducive to asking for donations.
The numbers to date don't allow one to draw the conclusion that Causes can be a reliable part of a fundraising portfolio.
Syam Buradagunta
Blue Sky Collaborative