I was hoping someone could help me clear up some confusion about valid licensing and upgrade paths. I've read through the forum, but I am still unclear on a few things...
1. If machines with Win98 and WinXP Home stickers were upgraded with WinXP Pro 'upgrades' (clean install) from Techsoup, are the licenses on those machines considered legally upgradeable to a Win7 license?
In other words, can you 'upgrade' an 'upgrade' license and be considered legally licensed, or is it dependent on the sticker on the machine?
2. In the list of "can" and "can't" upgrade paths, Windows 7 Home Premium is not mentioned. Does not seem to state definitively one way or another whether that particular version can be upgraded via Techsoup. What should be made of that?
3. If 'software assurance' is invoked to upgrade a Tech Soup donated XP Pro license to a Win7 license, does that mean the XP Pro license becomes invalid at the time of invoking 'software assurance'?
In other words, we have a handful of WinXP Pro licenses that can be upgraded via SA within the next month or so only. I think I'd like to take advantage of that so that we have the licenses for Win7. However, I don't know when we'd actually decide to physically install the upgrade. So, do the WinXP Pro licenses become invalid when we take possession of the Win7 license, or only after Win7 is installed? Could we revert back?
4. If 'software assurance' is invoked, does it in anyway reflect on the count towards the 2 year cycle? Would it count as a software request?
In other words, if we have not ordered any MS products in the last year (or 2 for that matter), and SA is invoked, would it still be the case that we have not ordered any MS products in the last year?
Thanks for any help!